Animal Curiosity

Satellite dish

Curiosity can mean many things. It gives the brain an appetite for discovery. It helps wild animals survive. It sometimes gets them into trouble—after all, what happened to the proverbial cat? And in other creatures, including humans, curiosity can occasionally be downright annoying.
When the screen on our Ring camera suddenly went blank, I went outside feeling more annoyance than curiosity. A cable swung in the breeze where it should have been attached to the satellite dish. It had happened before.
The culprit had vanished, but I hardly needed Sherlock Holmes to identify the suspect. It had a long reach, formidable claws, and an irresistible attraction to anything novel. We had caught the guilty paw before. Our game camera had photographed the very moment it was torn from the tree to which it had been fastened.
You guessed it. Bruin had paid us another visit.
Fortunately, the repair was simple, and I found myself laughing at the mischievous rascal. I was far more forgiving than if he had broken into the car or the home (see examples on YouTube). His actions reminded me how deeply curiosity is woven into the lives of wild animals.
That raises an interesting question. Has domestication reduced the need for curiosity in dogs and cats? Over thousands of years, humans have protected them from many of the hazards that once demanded constant vigilance and exploration. They no longer need all the survival skills of their wolf or wildcat ancestors. Yet they have evolved other abilities, particularly in understanding and communicating with humans. Domestic animals may not be less intelligent; rather, they have been formed by a fresh environment.
It is important not to confuse curiosity with intelligence. An animal—or a person—can be highly intelligent without being especially curious, while another may eagerly investigate everything without showing an exceptional reasoning ability. Curiosity and intelligence often reinforce one another, but they are distinct traits. Perhaps the conspicuous curiosity of certain animals can lead us to overestimate the breadth of their intelligence. Octopuses are undoubtedly among the most cognitively sophisticated invertebrates, yet part of their reputation comes from the striking way they explore and manipulate unfamiliar objects.
Psychologists increasingly recognize that human intelligence has many dimensions: logical reasoning, spatial ability, social understanding, emotional intelligence, creativity, and practical problem-solving, among others. Curiosity is not usually considered a form of intelligence in itself. Rather, it is the engine that drives learning. Without curiosity, knowledge stagnates.
Curiosity fuels adaptation, creativity, scientific discovery, and social understanding. When it is suppressed, personal growth suffers. Looking back, much of my education in junior school—and even later—seemed overly prescriptive. We memorized facts to pass examinations and were sometimes discouraged from asking difficult questions about the nature of Nature itself, and at precisely the age when young minds are most eager to explore. Wherever questions are discouraged or forbidden, accepted knowledge begins to fossilize, and progress slows. Every field—education, science, medicine, philosophy, and religion—depends on the willingness to question established ideas.
Personal experience is often a more powerful teacher than second-hand knowledge. Alice took a considerable risk when she followed the White Rabbit down the rabbit hole. Yet by becoming “curiouser and curiouser” in a world that didn’t make sense, she adapted, learned, and matured. Lewis Carroll understood that curiosity is both unsettling and transformative.
As for our bear, he was fortunate that the cable carried only a signal and not a dangerous electric current! On that occasion, curiosity brought him nothing but disappointment. Yet over millions of years, that same impulse has undoubtedly helped bears discover new food sources, avoid danger, and adapt to changing environments. Curiosity carries risks, but evolution has repeatedly found it worth the gamble.
Some would call it anthropomorphic to suggest that a bear can enjoy discovery. We cannot know exactly what another species experiences. Nevertheless, many animals clearly seek novelty even when there is no immediate reward. Crows investigate unfamiliar objects and fashion tools. Dolphins explore their surroundings and invent new games. Primates experiment, imitate, and learn from one another. Even our dogs and cats eagerly inspect unfamiliar sights, sounds, and scents. Curiosity appears to be one of Nature’s most successful strategies for thriving in an unpredictable world.
This also highlights an important difference between living minds and today’s artificial intelligence. Modern AI can answer questions, recognize patterns, and generate remarkably sophisticated responses, but it does not possess curiosity in the biological sense. It has no intrinsic desire to explore, no sense of wonder, and no satisfaction in making a discovery (or proof-reading this article!). Animals investigate because they are internally motivated to learn about their world. Their curiosity is a product of evolution. Ours became the foundation of science, art, and civilization itself.

Posted in Animalia, nature | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

World Bee Day Saturday

Aberdeen Bestiary
Aberdeen Bestiary, Aberdeen University, Folio 63r (CC)

The services of bees have been valued for millennia. In the early Middle Ages, they provided honey for sweetening, mead and beer, wax for candles, sealants, and much more. The only benefits never mentioned then are pollination services, the prime reason we celebrate them today.
So critical to the local economy, laws were enacted to protect bees in medieval Ireland. The Bechbretha set out rights for ownership and compensation.
This fragment of an English illuminated manuscript dates to about 1200 AD. It depicts bees as moral examples. They are hardworking and live peaceably with neighbors in a hierarchical society. Sermons were preached, praising their virtues in churches, though riddled with myths. The Big Bee was a king without a sting (more noble!) and his subjects were born in the carcasses of rotting oxen!

Posted in nature | Comments Off on World Bee Day Saturday

Bees get Revenge

Jars of honey

The top boxes in my hives felt heavy during an inspection, so it was time to harvest honey on Saturday. I only have two hives, more as a hobby than for honey that’s mostly used as gifts. Imported honey brings down the price in stores, one of the most adulterated products on the market because it is hard to detect dilution with sugar water. Trust local honey.
After extraction, I return the wet frames for bees to clean in the hive. I don’t take the comb because they invest more energy in making wax than honey (7:1).
Honey was the only sweetener available in medieval Europe, but beeswax was more valuable for making candles in churches and monasteries, and so much brighter and cleaner than tallow candles.
Before harvesting a frame of honey, it should have every cell in the comb capped with white wax. Frames are left in the hive if they have any brown caps that mean larvae inside.
After perforating caps with a prickly roller, the frames spin for each side using a motorized honey extractor (centrifuge) or, if you have few frames and like the exercise, a hand crank. Honey oozes out of a port in the cylinder’s base through a fine mesh to filter scraps of wax before decanting into jars. If honey is too runny in a humid spring, it may develop mold. No problem this year in a drought. Our product came out deep golden and viscous, not needing to be dried to concentrate it.
Bees hate to see (or smell) a beekeeper coming to rob their store, although I only take a fraction. My PEP protected me while a cloud of insects buzzed around. I didn’t get stung. But two days later, in another part of the garden, they found me out of my beesuit and got their revenge!

Posted in beekeeping | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Don’t Blame Pine Pollen for your Allergy

Pine tree pollen
No explanation needed

We know it’s April in Virginia when our car changes color under a coating of yellow pine pollen. The finger-writing on the car’s hood on the second day of pollen fall soon disappears under new layers, like the first footprints in snow vanish under fresh falls.
This event coincides with our peak allergy season, but don’t blame pines just because they produce the most abundant pollen. Their grains have a couple of bladders for buoyancy needed for wind pollination. But large size prevents them from descending deeply when we breathe, and, equally important, their smooth surface isn’t sticky. Easily blown off the hood.
Pine is an exception among wind-pollinated trees (and grasses) that are responsible for most seasonal allergies. Trees like birch and alder, and species of oak. Their grains are smaller, so they descend deeper down our windpipe, and sculpted or wrinkled surfaces stick to mucous membranes. Birch seems an exception to the rule until you notice the smooth triangular grains have points that make them prime allergy triggers too.
We are hardly affected by pollen transmitted by insects, birds, and bats. Maple, cherry, hornbeam, dogwood, tulip poplar etc.
Each pollen grain looks like a work of art under the scanning electron microscope. Their forms are unique to the species, which makes fossilized grains valuable in ecoarcheology.
That raises the question why? Like so much in biology, the answer is natural selection. Wind-pollinated grains are produced abundantly to ensure some land on female targets that match their contours, and small enough to drift far. On the other hand, animal-pollinated grains are adapted by co-evolution between the plant and animal vector for sticking to particular wings or feathers, etc.
Admire the beauty of the pollen story when you stop sneezing!

Posted in Seasons in Virginia, Trees | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Don’t Blame Pine Pollen for your Allergy

Published February 2026

Big Ben in London

Why do we age—and why has rejuvenation always proved so elusive?

This book expresses a clear-eyed, deeply informed exploration of the biology of aging and reproduction. Drawing on evolutionary biology, endocrinology, reproductive science, and medicine, it examines humanity’s perennial attempts to outwit time—and why biology so often resists our ambitions.

From Victorian gland grafting and early hormone experiments to contemporary treatment of infertility, menopause, and senescence, I trace how scientific insight has advanced and myths have perished.

I aim to explain with clarity and wit why fertility declines, why men and women age differently, and why extending the lifespan is far more challenging than a simple remedy. This is not a self-help guide and doesn’t offer recommendations for longevity. Instead, Cheating Time is an accessible and thought-provoking account of what science can—and cannot—do about aging, written for curious readers with an interest in medicine, biology, and the future of human reproduction.

This is the first digital edition. It is a reissue of the original print edition published in the USA and UK, revised with updated information.

This digital edition is available at Amazon for $3.99 (or equivalent currency) or free with Kindle Unlimited.

Posted in Health | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Published February 2026